Review



ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm)  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm)
    Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and <t>rCPM.</t> The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the <t>original</t> <t>connectome</t> proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,
    Ridge Regression Connectome Based Predictive Models (Rcpm), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm)/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Connectome-based machine learning models are vulnerable to subtle data manipulations"

    Article Title: Connectome-based machine learning models are vulnerable to subtle data manipulations

    Journal: Patterns

    doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100756

    Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the original connectome proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,
    Figure Legend Snippet: Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the original connectome proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,

    Techniques Used: Labeling

    Performance enhancement attacks in the SLIM dataset This example is shown for prediction of state anxiety in the SLIM dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. In the top row, prediction with the original dataset shows poor performance (r ≈ 0). In the second row, as in <xref ref-type=Figure 2 , an enhancement pattern proportional to the state anxiety measure can be added to random edges to enhance performance while maintaining very high correlations between the original and enhanced connectomes (r ≈ 0.99). In the bottom row, an enhancement pattern can be added to specific subnetworks to alter interpretation. Here, we targeted the enhancement pattern to the salience subnetwork, and the resulting coefficients reflect that edges in the salience network dominate the prediction outcome. " title="... in the SLIM dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. In the top row, prediction with the original ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
    Figure Legend Snippet: Performance enhancement attacks in the SLIM dataset This example is shown for prediction of state anxiety in the SLIM dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. In the top row, prediction with the original dataset shows poor performance (r ≈ 0). In the second row, as in Figure 2 , an enhancement pattern proportional to the state anxiety measure can be added to random edges to enhance performance while maintaining very high correlations between the original and enhanced connectomes (r ≈ 0.99). In the bottom row, an enhancement pattern can be added to specific subnetworks to alter interpretation. Here, we targeted the enhancement pattern to the salience subnetwork, and the resulting coefficients reflect that edges in the salience network dominate the prediction outcome.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm)
    Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and <t>rCPM.</t> The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the <t>original</t> <t>connectome</t> proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,
    Ridge Regression Connectome Based Predictive Models (Rcpm), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm)/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rcpm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the original connectome proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,

    Journal: Patterns

    Article Title: Connectome-based machine learning models are vulnerable to subtle data manipulations

    doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Main pipeline of performance enhancement attacks This example is shown for prediction of IQ in the HCP dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. The original dataset results in a prediction performance of r = 0.18 between measured and predicted IQ. Enhancement patterns (mean enhancement pattern shown) are added to the original connectome proportional to each participant’s Z -scored IQ. For the sake of visualization, we multiplied the enhancement patterns by 120, 80, and 40, or else they would be too small to see. The corresponding enhanced connectomes maintain average correlations of r ≈ 0.99 with the original connectomes, but the prediction performance is greatly enhanced. The networks labeled on the connectomes are as follows: MF, medial-frontal; FP, fronto-parietal; DMN, default mode; MOT, motor; VI, visual I; VII, visual II; VAs, visual association; SAL, salience; SC, subcortical; and CBL, cerebellum. ,

    Article Snippet: For all baseline regression models, we trained ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rCPM) in MATLAB (The MathWorks) with 10-fold cross-validation and a nested 10-fold cross-validation to select the L 2 regularization parameter, λ .

    Techniques: Labeling

    Performance enhancement attacks in the SLIM dataset This example is shown for prediction of state anxiety in the SLIM dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. In the top row, prediction with the original dataset shows poor performance (r ≈ 0). In the second row, as in <xref ref-type=Figure 2 , an enhancement pattern proportional to the state anxiety measure can be added to random edges to enhance performance while maintaining very high correlations between the original and enhanced connectomes (r ≈ 0.99). In the bottom row, an enhancement pattern can be added to specific subnetworks to alter interpretation. Here, we targeted the enhancement pattern to the salience subnetwork, and the resulting coefficients reflect that edges in the salience network dominate the prediction outcome. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Patterns

    Article Title: Connectome-based machine learning models are vulnerable to subtle data manipulations

    doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Performance enhancement attacks in the SLIM dataset This example is shown for prediction of state anxiety in the SLIM dataset with resting-state connectomes and rCPM. In the top row, prediction with the original dataset shows poor performance (r ≈ 0). In the second row, as in Figure 2 , an enhancement pattern proportional to the state anxiety measure can be added to random edges to enhance performance while maintaining very high correlations between the original and enhanced connectomes (r ≈ 0.99). In the bottom row, an enhancement pattern can be added to specific subnetworks to alter interpretation. Here, we targeted the enhancement pattern to the salience subnetwork, and the resulting coefficients reflect that edges in the salience network dominate the prediction outcome.

    Article Snippet: For all baseline regression models, we trained ridge-regression connectome-based predictive models (rCPM) in MATLAB (The MathWorks) with 10-fold cross-validation and a nested 10-fold cross-validation to select the L 2 regularization parameter, λ .

    Techniques: